Findings without an owner
The report exists, but nobody has the time or the Azure depth to work through it safely.
Azure Security Remediation
A cloud assessment, Microsoft Defender recommendation, pentest or internal review found Azure security issues, and nobody has the capacity to fix them properly. We work through an agreed set of findings, implement and validate the changes, and record what remains.
Defined scope. Tested changes. Practical handover.
Who it’s for
Problems we solve
The report exists, but nobody has the time or the Azure depth to work through it safely.
Rushed changes to network access, keys or policies can take a workload down.
Without validation and records, the same findings come back at the next review.
What we do
We triage a provided or validated findings list with you, agree priorities and what fixed means for each item, and plan each change with its access needs and rollback. We implement the approved changes, validate that each control works and record any residual risk. Typical areas include Defender for Cloud recommendations, Azure Policy, Key Vault, storage network access, Private Link, network security groups and monitoring, where they apply to your findings.
What you get
Out of scope
Done when
Every in-scope finding either passes its agreed validation or is recorded as blocked or accepted, with the residual risk written down. A change that fails validation is never reported as fixed.
What we need from you
The findings (redacted is fine to start), access to the affected subscriptions, the due date, and the person who approves changes.
FAQ
No. We work from findings you already have, or that we validate with you during scoping. Testing stays with your testing firm.
Small identity fixes can sit inside this work. If the main job is an Entra policy rollout, we scope it once under Microsoft Entra Identity Security, so the same work is never planned or billed twice.
This service fixes technical Azure security findings. Compliance Controls Implementation puts agreed controls into operation, with owners, procedures and evidence workflows. If a control needs a technical fix, we scope it once.
No. Fixing findings reduces risk and gives you evidence. Compliance views in Defender for Cloud are useful context, not a certification.
How it works
01
We review the environment and agree the scope, priorities, acceptance tests and change approach with you.
02
We make the approved changes under your change control, with rollback or recovery plans where appropriate.
03
We test against the agreed acceptance criteria. A failed test is recorded, not hidden.
04
You get the documentation, evidence and runbooks, plus a written list of anything still open.
No pitch · Canada-wide